RSI drops below 30: does it work in crypto?
An RSI reading under 30 is the most widely quoted "oversold" signal in technical analysis. We counted every time it happened on 94 major coins, 2,148 scored cases in all, and measured the following 7 days against each coin's ordinary behaviour.
Coins with evidence4 of 924 lean up · 0 lean down
No better than chance42 of 92coins
Scored cases2,148since 2017
The rule. 14-day RSI closes below 30 after being at or above it the day before.
Coin by coin
| Coin | Cases | Higher after 7d | Median | Ordinary | Gap | By luck | Proof score | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 70% | +4.7% | −1.1% | +5.8% | 11% | 84 | Strong evidence · leans up | |
| 26 | 73% | +6.9% | −1.6% | +8.4% | 11% | 82 | Strong evidence · leans up | |
| 20 | 70% | +6.0% | −0.9% | +6.9% | 16% | 69 | Some evidence · leans up | |
| 17 | 59% | +5.5% | −1.3% | +6.9% | 18% | 63 | Some evidence · leans up | |
| 37 | 62% | +2.0% | −1.0% | +3.0% | 45% | 51 | Weak evidence | |
| 32 | 69% | +2.4% | −1.0% | +3.4% | 41% | 50 | Weak evidence | |
| 33 | 58% | +2.6% | −1.3% | +3.9% | 50% | 49 | Weak evidence | |
| 26 | 69% | +5.1% | −0.1% | +5.2% | 33% | 49 | Weak evidence | |
| 16 | 56% | +5.7% | +0.6% | +5.0% | 29% | 48 | Weak evidence | |
| 36 | 56% | +1.0% | −1.3% | +2.3% | 68% | 48 | Weak evidence | |
| 32 | 63% | +2.1% | −0.2% | +2.3% | 63% | 47 | Weak evidence | |
| 29 | 59% | +2.3% | +0.5% | +1.8% | 64% | 46 | Weak evidence | |
| 26 | 54% | +3.6% | −0.8% | +4.4% | 55% | 46 | Weak evidence | |
| 29 | 59% | +2.2% | −0.8% | +3.1% | 64% | 46 | Weak evidence | |
| 34 | 59% | +1.1% | −0.6% | +1.7% | 81% | 46 | Weak evidence | |
| 24 | 63% | +3.9% | −0.6% | +4.5% | 55% | 45 | Weak evidence | |
| 29 | 52% | +0.9% | −0.8% | +1.7% | 77% | 44 | Weak evidence | |
| 23 | 57% | +2.7% | +0.7% | +2.0% | 59% | 44 | Weak evidence | |
| 24 | 63% | +3.5% | −0.4% | +3.9% | 61% | 44 | Weak evidence | |
| 18 | 61% | +4.4% | −1.4% | +5.8% | 49% | 44 | Weak evidence | |
| 13 | 77% | +5.1% | −2.7% | +7.8% | 52% | 44 | Weak evidence | |
| 20 | 30% | −5.8% | −0.9% | −4.9% | 56% | 44 | Weak evidence | |
| 28 | 36% | −3.4% | −0.7% | −2.8% | 72% | 44 | Weak evidence | |
| 25 | 60% | +2.0% | −1.8% | +3.7% | 61% | 44 | Weak evidence | |
| 17 | 71% | +9.1% | −1.5% | +10.6% | 15% | 43 | Weak evidence | |
| 28 | 54% | +0.7% | −1.2% | +1.9% | 80% | 43 | Weak evidence | |
| 21 | 57% | +2.9% | −1.2% | +4.1% | 63% | 43 | Weak evidence | |
| 20 | 55% | +2.2% | −2.2% | +4.4% | 59% | 43 | Weak evidence | |
| 14 | 64% | +3.6% | −2.0% | +5.6% | 55% | 43 | Weak evidence | |
| 27 | 56% | +0.9% | −1.2% | +2.1% | 75% | 43 | Weak evidence | |
| 18 | 67% | +4.1% | −1.3% | +5.4% | 58% | 43 | Weak evidence | |
| 18 | 72% | +3.8% | −0.4% | +4.2% | 59% | 43 | Weak evidence | |
| 17 | 65% | +2.7% | −0.5% | +3.2% | 58% | 43 | Weak evidence | |
| 28 | 39% | −2.4% | −0.7% | −1.6% | 85% | 42 | Weak evidence | |
| 33 | 48% | −1.3% | −1.7% | +0.4% | 97% | 42 | Weak evidence | |
| 25 | 40% | −3.4% | −1.3% | −2.1% | 82% | 42 | Weak evidence | |
| 19 | 58% | +1.9% | −1.6% | +3.5% | 65% | 42 | Weak evidence | |
| 13 | 62% | +4.0% | −1.2% | +5.2% | 68% | 41 | Weak evidence | |
| 19 | 68% | +1.2% | −0.3% | +1.5% | 74% | 41 | Weak evidence | |
| 24 | 54% | +0.5% | −1.5% | +2.0% | 82% | 41 | Weak evidence | |
| 22 | 64% | +2.9% | −0.3% | +3.2% | 75% | 41 | Weak evidence | |
| 18 | 61% | +2.3% | −0.2% | +2.5% | 74% | 40 | Weak evidence | |
| 15 | 67% | +4.8% | −0.1% | +4.9% | 70% | 40 | Weak evidence | |
| 23 | 48% | 0.0% | −1.7% | +1.7% | 87% | 40 | Weak evidence | |
| 26 | 50% | +0.2% | −0.4% | +0.6% | 93% | 40 | Weak evidence | |
| 20 | 50% | +0.8% | −1.3% | +2.2% | 87% | 39 | Weak evidence | |
| 20 | 60% | +1.0% | −0.7% | +1.6% | 91% | 38 | Weak evidence | |
| 18 | 50% | +1.2% | −1.2% | +2.3% | 87% | 38 | Weak evidence | |
| 12 | 58% | +2.6% | −0.1% | +2.6% | 87% | 36 | Weak evidence | |
| Convex Finance | 18 | 44% | −2.9% | −1.7% | −1.2% | 93% | 36 | Weak evidence |
| Floki | 11 | 36% | −0.4% | −1.9% | +1.5% | 93% | 33 | No better than chance |
| 13 | 46% | −0.9% | −1.4% | +0.5% | 98% | 32 | No better than chance | |
| 34 | 53% | +2.3% | −1.3% | +3.6% | 64% | 23 | No better than chance | |
| 39 | 51% | +0.8% | −0.8% | +1.6% | 79% | 23 | No better than chance | |
| 29 | 55% | +1.4% | −3.0% | +4.3% | 53% | 22 | No better than chance | |
| 29 | 55% | +2.2% | −1.1% | +3.3% | 61% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 38 | 50% | −0.4% | −0.8% | +0.4% | 96% | 20 | No better than chance | |
| 40 | 43% | −2.2% | −2.2% | +0.1% | 99% | 20 | No better than chance | |
| 10 | 50% | +0.4% | −1.9% | +2.3% | 91% | 19 | No better than chance | |
| 30 | 53% | +0.5% | −1.7% | +2.2% | 83% | 19 | No better than chance | |
| 28 | 43% | −3.7% | −1.2% | −2.4% | 82% | 18 | No better than chance | |
| 23 | 65% | +2.0% | −1.1% | +3.1% | 70% | 18 | No better than chance | |
| 10 | 50% | −1.7% | −0.3% | −1.5% | 95% | 17 | No better than chance | |
| 23 | 65% | +1.7% | −1.0% | +2.7% | 77% | 17 | No better than chance | |
| 20 | 45% | −3.4% | −0.3% | −3.1% | 65% | 17 | No better than chance | |
| 32 | 50% | −0.3% | −0.6% | +0.3% | 98% | 17 | No better than chance | |
| 27 | 48% | −0.6% | +0.3% | −0.9% | 92% | 16 | No better than chance | |
| 27 | 48% | 0.0% | −1.0% | +1.0% | 93% | 16 | No better than chance | |
| 31 | 45% | −1.4% | −1.2% | −0.2% | 99% | 16 | No better than chance | |
| 24 | 71% | +1.4% | +0.5% | +0.9% | 91% | 15 | No better than chance | |
| 22 | 55% | +0.7% | −1.5% | +2.2% | 82% | 15 | No better than chance | |
| 27 | 52% | +0.4% | −0.6% | +1.0% | 92% | 15 | No better than chance | |
| 21 | 52% | +0.1% | −1.5% | +1.6% | 84% | 15 | No better than chance | |
| 28 | 46% | −0.4% | −0.8% | +0.4% | 97% | 15 | No better than chance | |
| 27 | 48% | −0.7% | −0.6% | −0.1% | 100% | 14 | No better than chance | |
| 25 | 48% | −0.8% | −0.9% | 0.0% | 100% | 13 | No better than chance | |
| 22 | 45% | −0.9% | +0.1% | −1.0% | 94% | 13 | No better than chance | |
| 23 | 57% | +0.4% | −0.5% | +0.8% | 94% | 13 | No better than chance | |
| 19 | 37% | −2.5% | −0.5% | −1.9% | 89% | 13 | No better than chance | |
| 17 | 53% | +1.0% | −1.7% | +2.7% | 83% | 13 | No better than chance | |
| 25 | 48% | −1.4% | −1.3% | −0.1% | 100% | 13 | No better than chance | |
| 22 | 36% | −2.9% | −1.4% | −1.5% | 92% | 13 | No better than chance | |
| 19 | 42% | −2.1% | −0.6% | −1.5% | 93% | 12 | No better than chance | |
| 22 | 45% | −0.6% | −1.3% | +0.7% | 96% | 12 | No better than chance | |
| 22 | 45% | −0.8% | −0.4% | −0.4% | 99% | 12 | No better than chance | |
| 20 | 55% | +0.2% | −0.3% | +0.5% | 98% | 11 | No better than chance | |
| 16 | 38% | −3.3% | −1.7% | −1.6% | 91% | 11 | No better than chance | |
| 11 | 45% | −2.2% | −0.2% | −2.0% | 82% | 11 | No better than chance | |
| 17 | 53% | +0.9% | +0.1% | +0.7% | 96% | 10 | No better than chance | |
| 19 | 42% | −1.6% | −1.6% | 0.0% | 100% | 10 | No better than chance | |
| 18 | 33% | −3.5% | −3.4% | −0.1% | 100% | 9 | No better than chance | |
| 12 | 50% | −0.5% | −0.5% | 0.0% | 100% | 6 | No better than chance | |
| Worldcoin | 7 | 57% | +4.5% | −2.7% | +7.2% | 24% | Too few cases | |
| 9 | 67% | +1.8% | −2.5% | +4.4% | 38% | Too few cases |
With 94 coins tested, one or two would look convincing by luck alone. A signal that only “works” on a single coin deserves less trust than one that leans the same way on many. Method.