Extreme buy pressure: does it work in crypto?
Market buy orders taking an unusually large share of volume means buyers are paying up to get in rather than waiting. We counted every time it happened on 94 major coins, 5,005 scored cases in all, and measured the following 7 days against each coin's ordinary behaviour.
Coins with evidence0 of 940 lean up · 0 lean down
No better than chance48 of 94coins
Scored cases5,005since 2017
The rule. Share of volume from market buys in the top 3% of the previous 180 days.
Coin by coin
| Coin | Cases | Higher after 7d | Median | Ordinary | Gap | By luck | Proof score | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | 54% | +3.6% | −1.3% | +4.9% | 39% | 53 | Weak evidence | |
| 59 | 36% | −4.6% | −1.3% | −3.3% | 45% | 52 | Weak evidence | |
| 59 | 54% | +2.1% | −0.2% | +2.3% | 48% | 51 | Weak evidence | |
| 55 | 56% | +2.9% | −1.2% | +4.2% | 45% | 51 | Weak evidence | |
| 40 | 57% | +2.5% | −1.2% | +3.7% | 55% | 51 | Weak evidence | |
| 79 | 39% | −0.8% | +0.7% | −1.4% | 42% | 50 | Weak evidence | |
| 55 | 29% | −3.4% | −1.0% | −2.4% | 59% | 50 | Weak evidence | |
| 45 | 53% | +0.9% | −0.9% | +1.8% | 68% | 50 | Weak evidence | |
| 72 | 38% | −2.8% | −0.6% | −2.2% | 56% | 50 | Weak evidence | |
| 87 | 44% | −1.1% | +0.5% | −1.5% | 54% | 49 | Weak evidence | |
| 73 | 40% | −2.8% | −0.8% | −1.9% | 59% | 49 | Weak evidence | |
| 73 | 56% | +2.2% | +0.1% | +2.1% | 68% | 49 | Weak evidence | |
| 33 | 55% | +2.0% | −2.2% | +4.2% | 50% | 49 | Weak evidence | |
| 64 | 42% | −2.7% | −0.5% | −2.2% | 68% | 49 | Weak evidence | |
| 47 | 38% | −3.2% | −1.3% | −1.8% | 76% | 49 | Weak evidence | |
| 32 | 56% | +2.2% | −2.5% | +4.8% | 46% | 49 | Weak evidence | |
| 52 | 46% | −3.6% | −1.2% | −2.4% | 71% | 49 | Weak evidence | |
| 86 | 44% | −0.3% | +0.5% | −0.8% | 78% | 48 | Weak evidence | |
| 48 | 56% | +0.8% | −0.7% | +1.5% | 79% | 48 | Weak evidence | |
| 59 | 39% | −1.9% | −0.4% | −1.5% | 80% | 48 | Weak evidence | |
| 48 | 54% | +0.7% | −1.2% | +2.0% | 75% | 48 | Weak evidence | |
| 59 | 51% | +0.9% | −1.3% | +2.2% | 71% | 48 | Weak evidence | |
| 60 | 62% | +1.6% | +0.6% | +1.0% | 79% | 48 | Weak evidence | |
| 52 | 44% | −1.3% | −0.3% | −1.0% | 91% | 47 | Weak evidence | |
| 54 | 39% | −1.4% | −0.1% | −1.4% | 86% | 47 | Weak evidence | |
| 47 | 43% | −0.7% | −1.3% | +0.6% | 93% | 47 | Weak evidence | |
| 64 | 48% | −0.1% | −1.2% | +1.1% | 85% | 47 | Weak evidence | |
| 85 | 36% | −2.0% | −0.8% | −1.1% | 78% | 47 | Weak evidence | |
| 51 | 47% | −0.2% | −1.1% | +0.9% | 91% | 47 | Weak evidence | |
| 47 | 34% | −2.7% | −1.7% | −1.0% | 90% | 47 | Weak evidence | |
| 40 | 45% | −0.5% | −1.6% | +1.1% | 90% | 47 | Weak evidence | |
| 31 | 55% | +0.9% | −1.7% | +2.7% | 71% | 46 | Weak evidence | |
| 48 | 52% | +0.2% | −0.7% | +0.8% | 94% | 46 | Weak evidence | |
| 57 | 35% | −2.3% | −1.8% | −0.5% | 96% | 46 | Weak evidence | |
| 67 | 46% | −1.3% | −0.6% | −0.7% | 93% | 46 | Weak evidence | |
| 70 | 47% | −0.4% | −0.8% | +0.4% | 94% | 46 | Weak evidence | |
| 82 | 51% | +0.2% | +0.1% | +0.1% | 99% | 45 | Weak evidence | |
| 87 | 48% | −0.4% | −0.2% | −0.1% | 98% | 45 | Weak evidence | |
| 69 | 46% | −0.9% | −1.0% | +0.1% | 98% | 45 | Weak evidence | |
| Worldcoin | 28 | 29% | −6.7% | −2.7% | −4.0% | 62% | 45 | Weak evidence |
| 32 | 41% | −4.0% | −2.0% | −2.1% | 79% | 45 | Weak evidence | |
| 54 | 39% | −1.4% | −1.2% | −0.2% | 98% | 45 | Weak evidence | |
| 28 | 57% | +2.4% | −0.5% | +2.9% | 74% | 44 | Weak evidence | |
| 29 | 41% | −0.9% | −1.5% | +0.6% | 96% | 41 | Weak evidence | |
| 24 | 54% | +1.3% | −1.4% | +2.7% | 79% | 41 | Weak evidence | |
| 24 | 38% | −4.0% | −1.9% | −2.1% | 86% | 41 | Weak evidence | |
| 47 | 57% | +1.4% | −0.4% | +1.7% | 58% | 25 | No better than chance | |
| 89 | 53% | +2.0% | +0.3% | +1.7% | 55% | 24 | No better than chance | |
| 65 | 52% | +0.7% | −0.8% | +1.5% | 67% | 24 | No better than chance | |
| 46 | 54% | +1.3% | −0.9% | +2.2% | 74% | 24 | No better than chance | |
| 52 | 33% | −3.7% | −1.6% | −2.1% | 74% | 24 | No better than chance | |
| 42 | 33% | −3.3% | −1.4% | −1.9% | 81% | 23 | No better than chance | |
| 49 | 43% | −1.1% | −3.0% | +1.8% | 79% | 23 | No better than chance | |
| 52 | 54% | +0.3% | −1.3% | +1.7% | 82% | 23 | No better than chance | |
| 43 | 49% | 0.0% | −1.7% | +1.7% | 86% | 23 | No better than chance | |
| 68 | 50% | +0.1% | −1.3% | +1.4% | 73% | 23 | No better than chance | |
| 26 | 54% | +3.0% | −1.5% | +4.5% | 47% | 22 | No better than chance | |
| 49 | 43% | −2.2% | −1.3% | −0.9% | 92% | 22 | No better than chance | |
| 61 | 54% | +0.2% | −0.8% | +1.0% | 82% | 22 | No better than chance | |
| 42 | 43% | −2.7% | −1.7% | −1.0% | 90% | 22 | No better than chance | |
| 62 | 48% | −1.5% | −0.7% | −0.8% | 91% | 22 | No better than chance | |
| 82 | 45% | −1.1% | −0.1% | −1.0% | 82% | 22 | No better than chance | |
| Convex Finance | 40 | 43% | −2.7% | −1.7% | −1.0% | 90% | 22 | No better than chance |
| 43 | 49% | −0.4% | −1.5% | +1.1% | 88% | 22 | No better than chance | |
| 52 | 42% | −0.4% | −1.4% | +1.0% | 90% | 22 | No better than chance | |
| 56 | 48% | −1.0% | −0.6% | −0.4% | 98% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 72 | 44% | −0.6% | −1.1% | +0.5% | 93% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 62 | 32% | −0.9% | −0.6% | −0.4% | 96% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 59 | 44% | −1.1% | −0.8% | −0.3% | 98% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 46 | 39% | −1.2% | −1.5% | +0.3% | 97% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 69 | 46% | −1.0% | −0.5% | −0.6% | 93% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 59 | 46% | −1.5% | −1.0% | −0.5% | 96% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 61 | 51% | 0.0% | −0.6% | +0.6% | 94% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 48 | 38% | −2.5% | −2.2% | −0.2% | 97% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 48 | 38% | −2.3% | −1.7% | −0.6% | 95% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 54 | 43% | −1.8% | −1.2% | −0.6% | 95% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 55 | 51% | +0.1% | −0.4% | +0.5% | 96% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| Floki | 39 | 36% | −2.5% | −1.9% | −0.6% | 95% | 21 | No better than chance |
| 61 | 46% | −0.3% | −0.6% | +0.3% | 97% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 52 | 44% | −0.9% | −0.3% | −0.6% | 95% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 61 | 51% | +0.3% | −0.4% | +0.7% | 92% | 21 | No better than chance | |
| 63 | 46% | −0.9% | −1.0% | +0.1% | 99% | 20 | No better than chance | |
| 71 | 45% | −1.0% | −0.9% | −0.1% | 99% | 20 | No better than chance | |
| 55 | 42% | −1.2% | −1.1% | −0.1% | 99% | 20 | No better than chance | |
| 58 | 50% | −0.1% | −0.1% | −0.1% | 99% | 20 | No better than chance | |
| 38 | 42% | −1.3% | −1.6% | +0.3% | 98% | 20 | No better than chance | |
| 49 | 49% | −0.1% | −0.3% | +0.1% | 99% | 20 | No better than chance | |
| 63 | 48% | −1.2% | −1.3% | 0.0% | 100% | 20 | No better than chance | |
| 50 | 46% | −0.4% | −0.5% | +0.1% | 99% | 20 | No better than chance | |
| 34 | 53% | +0.2% | −0.3% | +0.5% | 92% | 19 | No better than chance | |
| 24 | 54% | +2.3% | −0.2% | +2.5% | 60% | 18 | No better than chance | |
| 28 | 25% | −2.2% | −3.4% | +1.2% | 92% | 16 | No better than chance | |
| 28 | 50% | −0.9% | −0.3% | −0.6% | 97% | 15 | No better than chance | |
| 25 | 32% | −1.9% | −2.7% | +0.8% | 96% | 14 | No better than chance |
With 94 coins tested, one or two would look convincing by luck alone. A signal that only “works” on a single coin deserves less trust than one that leans the same way on many. Method.